Progress through persuasion, not coercion

The Liberty Progressive Framework

A political philosophy grounded in freedom, fallibilism, and decentralized problem-solving.

Take the Quiz →

What is Liberty Progressivism?

Liberty Progressivism descends from the Enlightenment tradition and critical rationalism. It holds that the means of progress are more fundamental than any particular progressive outcome. If we protect the mechanisms of error correction—free speech, distributed power, decentralized experimentation—good outcomes can emerge from the iterative process of learning.

When moral certainty replaces open inquiry, progressivism becomes regressive by preserving ideology and dogma instead of expanding knowledge. True progress requires epistemic humility: every society must stay open to being wrong.

Following philosopher David Deutsch, a Liberty Progressive treats freedom not as an abstract moral entitlement, but as a functional requirement for problem-solving. Freedom is what allows errors to be revealed, alternative solutions to be tested, and new explanations to be generated.

Explore the full framework →

The Two Principal Axes

Modern progressivism can be mapped along two key dimensions that explain the majority of variance in political philosophy.

Liberty ↔ Statist

Where do you locate problem-solving capacity?

Liberty: Trust contestable, plural, exit-based systems. Progress emerges from individuals and institutions experimenting, criticizing, and learning from failure. Power should be distributed so it can be challenged.

Statist: Trust centralized coordination with uniform standards and expert control. Progress is directed through organized expertise, planning, and coordinated policy.

Reformer ↔ Revolutionary

How should change occur?

Reformer: Society is improvable through iterative change—test, learn, adapt. Embrace fallibilism, reversibility, and tolerance of dissent. Existing institutions can be vehicles for progress.

Revolutionary: Society is fundamentally broken and requires systemic transformation. Moral certainty justifies urgent action. Ends can justify means when the cause is just.

The Four Quadrants

When we plot the two axes together, four distinct political orientations emerge within the progressive sphere.

Epistemic Reformers

Liberty + Reformer

Pragmatic, pro-freedom, pro-abundance. Trust distributed problem-solving and iterative error correction. Embrace fallibilism and see criticism as essential input.

Open System Radicals

Liberty + Revolutionary

Radical decentralizers who believe systems are broken but should be replaced with open, permissionless alternatives rather than centralized control.

Technocratic Pragmatists

Statist + Reformer

Skilled managers who favor expert-driven policy and evidence-based reform through existing institutions. Accept tradeoffs and value process.

Moral Centralizers

Statist + Revolutionary

Moral crusaders who believe society requires fundamental transformation through centralized action. Prioritize outcomes over process.

Three Means of Error Correction

To sustain progress, society must preserve these essential mechanisms:

Where Do You Stand?

Take our 20-question quiz to discover where you fall on the two principal axes of modern progressivism.

Take the Quiz →